- Developing approaches to regulation for the use of technology in legal services
- Part 1: Alison Hook: Lessons from abroad – international approaches to regulating legal technology
- Part 2: Professor Roger Brownsword: What can legal services regulators learn from medicine and finance?
- Promoting the wider use of regulatory sandboxes
In its business plan 19/20, The LSB introduced a new policy objective focused on ensuring that regulation keeps pace with technological innovation. Projects being undertaken to deliver this objective are detailed below:
New technological innovations, including artificial intelligence applications like algorithmic decision-making, automated document assembly, and chatbots as well as other developments such as blockchain, have the potential to transform how legal services are provided, including making them more accessible and cheaper for consumers, but they also create risks for consumers and providers.
In November 2018, the LSB published a research report entitled Technology and Innovation in Legal Services which found that legal services providers want to make use of technological innovations, but many do not because of real, or perceived, regulatory, ethical and practical risks.
It will be up to the legal service regulators to anticipate and respond to the risks raised by new technologies so that legal service providers can use them to deliver better services to consumers.
Developing approaches to regulation for the use of technology in legal services
We’re developing a new resource of information and advice for legal services regulators to use as they develop their respective approaches to technology regulation that meet the needs of the professions and consumers. To do this, we’ve invited experts in legal services and technology – including academics, legal professionals, and tech specialists – to contribute their views on these issues.
Over the next year, these experts will submit papers examining a range of topics regulators will need to consider. To complement these papers, each will sit down to talk to us about their findings in ‘Talking Tech’, the new LSB podcast.
The first two papers and the episodes of ‘Talking Tech’ that accompany them are available now. Read the papers and listen to the interviews with their authors below. ‘Talking Tech’ is also available on iTunes, Spotify and Amazon’s Alexa.
Further instalments of the series will be released later this summer, with topics including: blockchain, the impact of technology on legal education, and the impact of technology on the regulatory framework created by the Legal Services Act 2007.
NB: The views expressed in these papers and podcasts are those of the authors, and do not represent the views of the Legal Services Board. The Board will respond to the papers upon conclusion of the project in early 2020.
Part 1: Alison Hook: Lessons from abroad – international approaches to regulating legal technology
About this paper
The paper explores the adoption of legal technology in key jurisdictions and how legal regulators are responding, before looking for possible lessons from other sectors. The report concludes with some recommendations addressed both to the LSB and the frontline legal regulators in England and Wales. The paper is accompanied by a podcast which is available below.
About Alison Hook
Alison is the co-founder of Hook Tangaza following the merger of Hook International and Tangaza Advisory Services in 2016. Alison leads on Hook Tangaza’s technical assistance, trade and regulatory work.
Before setting up Hook International in 2011, Alison was the Director of International at the Law Society of England and Wales where she played a leading role in advocating for more open legal markets and working with government to develop an export promotion strategy for UK legal services.
Earlier in her career, Alison worked for the European Commission, both in London and Brussels and for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London and Lagos. She graduated in economics from the University of Edinburgh and holds a Masters in Economics from Warwick University and an MBA from the Open University.
Part 2: Professor Roger Brownsword: What can legal services regulators learn from medicine and finance?
About this paper
This paper considers how regulators in professional services sectors other than law, particularly health and financial services, are regulating new technologies used to deliver consumer services, and what lessons legal services regulators can learn from their experience.
The paper is accompanied by a podcast which is available below.
About Roger Brownsword
Roger Brownsword holds professorial positions in Law at King’s College London and Bournemouth University, and he is an honorary Professor in Law at the University of Sheffield.
His many publications in the area of law and technology include Law and Human Genetics: Regulating a Revolution (Hart, 1998) (co-edited with W.R. Cornish, and M Llewelyn), Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw (OUP, 2001) (with Deryck Beyleveld), Rights, Regulation and the Technological Revolution (OUP, 2008), Regulating Technologies (Hart, 2008) (co-edited with Karen Yeung), Law and the Technologies of the Twenty-First Century (CUP, 2012) (with Morag Goodwin), the Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation and Technology (OUP, 2017) (co-edited with Eloise Scotford and Karen Yeung), and Law, Technology and Society: Re-imagining the Regulatory Environment (Routledge, 2019).
He is the founding general editor (with Han Somsen) of Law, Innovation and Technology; and he has been a specialist adviser to parliamentary committees as well as being a member of various committees, research groups, and working parties focusing on aspects of law and technology, most recently the Royal Society Working Party on Machine Learning.
For more information on this project, please contact the project manager, David Fowlis.
Promoting the wider use of regulatory sandboxes
In addition to the work described above , in 2019/20 we will also be undertaking a project to promote the wider use of ‘sandboxes’ by sector regulators. Sandboxes are a way for regulators to create a ‘safe space’ where providers can develop their innovations and test them with real consumers under the regulators’ supervision. Further details of this project are forthcoming.